The Cutest Puppy In The World
Finfolk
SocketsCDR
While much of my experience of music can be characterized by the bawdy joys and cheap thrills of an unthinking, visceral engagement with noise and energy, on a conceptual level the question of what music is or should be is something that I’ve come to take pretty seriously as of late. For me, all music—indeed, all meaningful artistic creation—should ideally strive towards the expansion of the total content and quality of what it means to be human. Beyond simply representing existing extremes of our collective personalities and psyches, our experience of music and our participation in music should in turn render such extremes more vivid and profound. Rather than simply depicting feelings, music should make us feel more. Rather than simply depicting dreams, music should enable us to dream more and to provide all dreams with a substance and a physicality that throbs, shakes, and rattles our bodies to the fucking floor.
That contemporary pop music falls short of these prerogatives should be relatively obvious given that the total range of allowable human substance it presents is rarely less mediocre than the worst trade-paper romance novels or more evocative than the most straight-forward corner store pornography. None of this should be surprising, of course. Pop music is simply another commodity produced by an industry; its trajectory and boundaries are determined by profit, shifts in stock prices, and any manner of coldly calculated business decisions.
By contrast, the extent to which experimental music falls short of these prerogatives is far more heart-breaking. As a medium that is generally insulated from the even the risk of profitability by virtue of being a comparatively “difficult†kind of music, experimental possesses a unique capacity to carry out music-making without much real concern for the dictates of the marketplace. With the exception of odd groups like Sonic Youth, Boredoms, or Lightning Bolt—groups who have somehow taken their music far enough into public consumption that they are now generally be able to live off the noise they make—experimental artists can largely expect little in terms of recognition and even less in terms of wages. As much as this situation may not benefit the physical survival of artists living under a capitalist economy, the one positive effect of this mess is that it more or less limits the considerations involved in producing art limited to the artistic product itself.
And yet, however great the promise of this situation for an underground music scene whose primary goal is the further realization of humanity itself, the reality has been sadly very different. Experimental art has all too often rejected humanity and organized itself not as a project rooted in the general development of human consciousness on a total scale, but as the joyless playplace of intellectual and fashion elites. Sentimentality, sadness, romance, love, and passion—human things—are all too absent from this art. Rather than looking upon something that represents who we are or who we could be—with all of our hope and our tangles—this art reveals little to us beyond coldly woven structures built in a language of pure specialists, feelingless architects, and fascists. Atonality, dissonance, and all the glorious things that happen when instruments are played incorrectly become in turn manifestations of “sophisticated technique†and “expertise.†All participation and parity between the performer and audience are removed; The Artist alone possesses the talent of meaningful creation, and is thus free to exercise this genius in exchange for appreciation, aggrandizement, and social and cultural status.
As I see it, “high art†is the general plague of experimental music and I can’t help but wonder if anyone who intentionally produces experimental work in such a vein has ever understood artistic creation or ever appreciated the full possibilities that are contained within it. That this mindset is so predominant, that this scene is so overtaken with such devils of self-importance and carefully-maintained elitisms, that so much of the content of experimental music is the denial of such human things as feeling, frailty, and whimsy, constitutes the true failure of this music today. What is fortunate for us is that this failure is by no means total and the groups and artists capable of joining the wide-open stylistic language of experimental music with a human roughness and simplicity—punks, in other words—are without a doubt some of the brightest lights in today’s avant garde.
Now, having never met either of the two individuals that make up the band The Cutest Puppy In The World, I can’t particularly make any real claims about what they see as the meaning behind their music and its relationship to human consciousness, but even still, if their recent CDR release Finfolk is any indication, these kids are exactly the type of punk experimentalists that are capable of combining the coarse, broken sounds of their oeuvre with the warmth and rich simplicity of living, breathing dreams and emotion. Recorded live in Washington DC during the year 2005, the pieces featured on Finfolk are a gloriously unkempt patchwork of repetitions, brutal deconstructions, looping notes, dark grumbles, and carefully orchestrated musical phrases.
Through the twists and turns of their meandering improvisations, The Cutest Puppy conjure forth a musical language that is somehow able to borrow equally from the gritty amp-hum claustrophobia of Labradford-inflected drone, the chaotic ecstasy of pure noise rock, and the mangled, soulful kinetics of free jazz. From this strange vantage point in the nexus of these disparate traditions and vocabularies, The Cutest Puppy manifest pieces of music whose range and depth is nearly as varied and limitless as the imagination itself. On “Sordomuticsâ€â€”the album’s opener—the band’s musical process leads through a haze of gnarling instrumental whines and pings into a slow-rising lament of bass clarinet and piano; on “OlOld Orcadian†this process leads straight into a frenzy discord and fire; on “Nangen Cuts The Cat In Two†this process brings about sentiment, gentle harmony, and occasional, clattering celebrations.
What fundamentally seems to set The Cutest Puppy so far apart from the larger portion of the experimental scene is that for all their variations and stylistic diversity, they still seem very much concerned with the making of music, with all its robustly humanistic implications. While all the pieces on Finfolk contain their challenging and boldly innovative aspects, the experimentalism that underlies them is a decidedly permissive one in that rather than seeking to gestate some new completed vision of patently artificial or purely conceived sound, The Cutest Puppy allows their pieces to flow together organically, taking in melody and discord in whatever quantities that might instinctually seem to be right. This aspect of the tracks featured on Finfolk is without a doubt one of their most honest characteristics, and combined with the album’s decidedly DIY packaging and the innate realness of its live recording, it produces an air of genuine intimacy between those encountering these tracks and the artists responsible for their creation.
Without knowing more about this band or their intentions, I would wager that Finfolk isn’t particularly intended as any manner of serious insurrection against the establishment of today’s experimental music. Even still, through their unpretentious, wildly humanistic ministrations on this release, The Cutest Puppy In The World does succeed in underscoring some of the impressive potential that experimental music regularly fails to live up to. This record demonstrates in brilliantly unassuming terms that experimental music can not only exist without all its intellectual poses, but can also beat and shake with all the delicate passion and warmth of a heart and a soul.